s Oedipus Complex

, so watching the play was crucial for my understanding. The only thing in the play that I didn’t like is how the facts start to come up, but it took so long for Oedipus and Jocasta to figure out what had happened. Teiresias tells Oedipus he is the killer, and Oedipus still does not remember about what had happened at the place where three roads meet. That for me sounds almost impossible. Freud explains his theory of a child’s emotional conflict with the parents thus: â€Å"If Oedipus Rex moves a modern audience no less than it did the contemporary Greek one, the explanation can only be that its effect does not lie in the contrast between destiny and human will, but is to be looked for in the particular nature of the material on which that contrast is exemplified.† Furthermore, he makes another good point in saying that Sophocles’ work absolves men from any amoral responsibility and justifies the occurrence of the crimes as the gods’ will, as predicted by the oracle of Apollo. Thus, Oedipus Rex is a prime tragic play that has been studied and deconstructed by many philosophers and thinkers such as Freud for the complexity and depth of its work, finding in it explanations for human behaviors. The play describes so well human nature and the inevitable fate of man despite the concept of free will.... 's Oedipus Complex Free Essays on Freud\'s Oedipus Complex I was interested when I found out that we were supposed to read Oedipus Rex because for awhile I was in a psychoanalyses group where we would talk about our lives and hear about other people’s lives. In many of those sessions the psychologist would mention the Oedipus Complex, but I had no idea what it was about. After awhile I found out that it had something to do with the son being in love with the mother, or the daughter with her father, or that a man look for characteristics in a woman that remind him of his mother. While reading the play I had trouble understanding many of the words, so watching the play was crucial for my understanding. The only thing in the play that I didn’t like is how the facts start to come up, but it took so long for Oedipus and Jocasta to figure out what had happened. Teiresias tells Oedipus he is the killer, and Oedipus still does not remember about what had happened at the place where three roads meet. That for me sounds almost impossible. Freud explains his theory of a child’s emotional conflict with the parents thus: â€Å"If Oedipus Rex moves a modern audience no less than it did the contemporary Greek one, the explanation can only be that its effect does not lie in the contrast between destiny and human will, but is to be looked for in the particular nature of the material on which that contrast is exemplified.† Furthermore, he makes another good point in saying that Sophocles’ work absolves men from any amoral responsibility and justifies the occurrence of the crimes as the gods’ will, as predicted by the oracle of Apollo. Thus, Oedipus Rex is a prime tragic play that has been studied and deconstructed by many philosophers and thinkers such as Freud for the complexity and depth of its work, finding in it explanations for human behaviors. The play describes so well human nature and the inevitable fate of man despite the concept of free will....

3 Cases Where One Word Makes a Difference

3 Cases Where One Word Makes a Difference 3 Cases Where One Word Makes a Difference 3 Cases Where One Word Makes a Difference By Mark Nichol Often, the presence or absence of one word, or its location, can change the meaning of a sentence, or at the least affect the statement’s clarity. In each of the following sentences, inserting, omitting, or moving a word, respectively, improves its readability. Discussion and revision explain and demonstrate this improvement in each case. 1. Executive management should ensure that their companies are focused on the attributes that make for early-mover status and implement an early-warning capability. This sentence intends to say that executive management should do two things: Ensure something and implement something. But it reads as if the company should do two things: focus on something and implement something. Or does it read as if the attributes do two things (make for early-mover status and implement an early-warning capability)? For the sentence to be clear- for the suggested reinterpretation to make sense and the ambiguity of the sentence organization to be eliminated- the auxiliary verb should must be repeated: â€Å"Executive management should ensure that their companies are focused on the attributes that make for early-mover status and should implement an early-warning capability.† 2. Healthcare providers are expected to not only keep up with these changes, but also to look ahead. In this sentence, because the first to precedes â€Å"not only,† it serves for â€Å"but also† as well: â€Å"Healthcare providers are expected to not only keep up with these changes but also look ahead.† (If to followed â€Å"not only,† it would apply only to that phrase and a corresponding to would be necessary after the complementary phrase â€Å"but also.†) 3. A security breach can be costly both in terms of costs and reputation. Here, the placement of both is problematic- its location before â€Å"in terms of costs† implies that a corresponding (perhaps even identical) prepositional phrase will precede reputation, but if â€Å"in terms of† is to serve both costs and reputation, it must precede both (by preceding both): â€Å"A security breach can be costly in terms of both costs and reputation.† Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Style category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:English Grammar 101: All You Need to KnowYay, Hooray, Woo-hoo and Other AcclamationsPunctuation Is Powerful